[IRCServices Coding] SET RESTRICTED, and possibly AKICK flaw

[Bergee]

	For what it's worth, I've had users report this to me as well but I 
have had no luck in reproducing it.  I should add that I don't remember 
it happening lately -- but it was quite rare to begin with so that may 
not mean anything.

Bergee

Dionisios K. wrote:
> I have seen it too but i'm unable to reproduce it.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin Burchell" 
> <surreal.w00t at gmail.com>
> To: <ircservices-coding at ircservices.esper.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:19 PM
> Subject: [IRCServices Coding] SET RESTRICTED, and possibly AKICK flaw
> 
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've seen this happen once or twice, but was never able to reproduce 
>> it - last night it got a little major, so I thought I'd better send it 
>> on to the list.
>>
>> It appears sometimes on a violation of AKICK or SET RESTRICTED, 
>> ChanServ doesn't add a +b to the channel, leading to fun endless 
>> JOIN/KICK floods. Sometimes, ChanServ wakes up after a while - 
>> yesterday this wasn't the case...
>>
>> [04:32:59] * You were kicked from #helpers by ChanServ (You are not 
>> permitted to be on this channel.)
>> [04:33:01] * You were kicked from #helpers by ChanServ (You are not 
>> permitted to be on this channel.)
>> [04:33:04] * You were kicked from #helpers by ChanServ (You are not 
>> permitted to be on this channel.)
>>
>> ...
>>
>> [05:09:41] * You were kicked from #helpers by ChanServ (You are not 
>> permitted to be on this channel.)
>> [05:09:43] * You were kicked from #helpers by ChanServ (You are not 
>> permitted to be on this channel.)
>> [05:09:45] * You were kicked from #helpers by ChanServ (You are not 
>> permitted to be on this channel.)
>> [05:09:46] #helpers unable to join channel (address is banned)
>>
>>
>> That ban being a +b Guest*!*@* set by someone else on the channel.
>>
>> IRCd is Unreal (3.2.2b, for the terminally curious) - services are at 
>> 5.0.55, with some modules, but no core tweaks.
>>
>> If anyone else has ideas, because this one has me a little stumped...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> w00t.