[IRCServices Coding] Re: idea about database names

[Finny Merrill]

On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Andrew Church wrote:

> >On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Finny Merrill wrote:
> >
> >> I think the [open|sync|close]_x_db functions should really all be handled 
> >> by one function each (open_databases etc).
> 
>      And just how do you plan to handle having some modules loaded and not
> others?

Err.... ya
> 
> >> The way MySQL works, it would be easier for AKILL, S-lines and other 
> >> operserv things to be handled in one database
> 
>       So use tables for crying out loud.

Well I thought it would be kind of a hack if the AKILL table had a 
different name for every database. I guess what I'm really getting at is 
to have the database names under the database module instead of under
the individual modules.

> 
>   --Andrew Church
>     achurch at achurch.org
>     http://achurch.org/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices-coding
>