[IRCServices Coding] feature request: instant messanger fields

Anton Volkov phant0m at myrealbox.com
Mon Dec 29 15:59:45 PST 2003

I think you have not understood my proposal, and even if this is a major change the way you judge its usefulness is totally wrong, plus what's protocol documentation has to do with a simple email?
And unless you got something smart to say don't say it.

-----Original Message-----
From: ircservices-coding-bounces at ircservices.za.net [mailto:ircservices-coding-bounces at ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Craig McLure
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 2:24 AM
To: ircservices-coding at ircservices.za.net
Subject: Re: [IRCServices Coding] feature request: instant messanger fields

(Sorry this went to the wrong list..)

i think that 'IM Fields' is a very significant change for something so minor. The MSN, AOL and Y! protocols arnt documented, yet those and the ICQ protocol are _VERY_ complex in the way they work, and it all seems kinda pointless.