[IRCServices] Suspended Channels

[dreamer at darkness.gr]

Greetings all, 

	I had the same idea before months. I believe that the best idea
based on "channel suspension" is to "Freeze" the channel. 

That could be :
Not allowing the users to join the channel,
Preserve the access list of the channel, plus any akicks and levels
settings.
And for sure , never allowing a change in the access list of that channel.

If possible , an enforce could be implement, that will kick all users out
of channel by the time of suspension. And also, a non strict suspend, that
could let users to join the channel but totally freeze the levels and
access lists could be an idea.

Regards,
Nick Krassas


On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Andrew Kempe wrote:

> I'm finishing off the implementation of channel suspensions. I was wondering
> what the general feeling was regarding the effect a suspension has on a
> channel.
> 
> Should a suspended channel:
> - allow users to join?
> - operate normally but prevent any setting or access-list changes from being
> made?
> - prevent changes from being made and not grant access as per the channel's
> access list?
> 
> Would various levels of suspension be usefull? Would this be too confusing?
> Should this be a level-based or flag-based system?
> 
> Your ideas would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks, Andrew


---------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at ender.shadowfire.org
with "unsubscribe ircservices" in the body, without the quotes.