[IRCServices] Desired behavior of channel suspension?

[&quot]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Church" <achurch at achurch.org>
To: <ircservices at Snow.shadowfire.org>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 11:59 PM
Subject: [IRCServices] Desired behavior of channel suspension?

>      - Should a suspended channel be treated like a forbidden one (no
> one can enter it) or an unregistered one (it can be used, but Services
> won't do anything do it)?  [forbidden]

Forbidden

>      - Should Services allow changes to the channel settings?  I think
> this one is a pretty clear "no", but I'll put it up for debate.  [no]

No

>      - Should Services allow the founder to drop the channel?  The
> current behavior of suspended nicknames is that the owner cannot drop
> them, but this is only because the owner cannot identify for them and
> not because Services specifically prevents dropping; I could see
> suspended channels going either way.  [undecided]

No, because they could just turn around and re-register the channel, which
defeats
part of the purpose of suspending it.

>      - Should Services allow memos to be sent to the channel?  [no]
> Incidentally, 4.4.x allows memos to be sent to suspended nicks; I'm
> planning on disabling that as well unless someone convinces me
> otherwise.

No.


Anyway, that's just my $1.82.  Now I just need my change back... ;D


---------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at snow.shadowfire.org
with "unsubscribe ircservices" in the body, without the quotes.