[IRCServices] (no subject)

[Scott Seufert]

I agree, especially since there is nothing stating that a ChanOp _needs_
a reason to ban. Just like IRCops, ChanOps do not need a reason to deny
access to a server/channel.

Dryder

Gregory King wrote:
> 
> Assuming that people doing the banning would supply intelligent
> information?  I think the reason field would be filled with "Banned" or
> the like, requiring you or the banee to contact the channel founder for
> the reason.  Why not suggest the banee do that now?
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, black at netguardian.org wrote:
> 
> > Hi ,
> > I have a suggestion but not sure if it is possible or not.
> > I have some problems with users who are always asking why did they banned from a channel. So it is impossible to determine why did they banned then I can't give any answer.
> >
> > In my opinion, changing the ban format to ban nick reason would be a great sollution. So it can be seen in the ban list why a person banned ...
> >
> > Is it possible to do something like this ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > RiCk_DaNGeRouS
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Mail2Web - Check your email from the web at
> > http://www.mail2web.com/ .
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, mail ircservices-request at ircservices.za.net
> > with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject of the mail.
> > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
> >
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail ircservices-request at ircservices.za.net
> with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject of the mail.
> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices