[IRCServices] /ns ghost exploit
Mark Hetherington
mark at ctcp.net
Thu Mar 14 22:37:00 PST 2002
> yeah, if the user has identified, then it is an obvious ghost, if
> the user
> hasn, then it is prolly a mistake.. then we come across access
> lists.. some
> ppl dont need to identify cause their host is in them.. could this be a
> prob?
Good point. I guess testing the NickServ level would be the ideal way since
checking for a status of 2 would find if the nick was recognised by access
list only with a status of 3 for identified.
If the access list is too vague it could lead to similar problems with
popular ISPs and there is little to stop someone adding in a whole set of
masks so maybe it is worth ignoring anything but fully identified nicks.
Recover and release would work in any case so might not be a huge problem
and may encourage users to identify.
--
Mark.