[IRCServices] Chanserv forbid..

[Andrew Church]

     I generally haven't seen a need for a reason for FORBID, but the fact
that just about every other access-limiting command (SUSPEND, S*LINE, etc.)
has one is a pretty good argument for adding one to FORBID as well.  I was
pretty sure this was in the TODO list, but apparently not; I'll add it for
consideration in a future version.

  --Andrew Church
    achurch at achurch.org
    http://achurch.org/

>Its strange point of view... here on Brazil, on all networks, forbid is used
>not just for the name of the channel. An example is channel of nazists, or
>racists, or people that causes any problems to users or networks.
>If Im wrong.. sorry for comment this idea :-)
>
>Diego Bitencourt Contezini aka destruct_
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Finny Merrill" <griever at t2n.org>
>To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices at ircservices.za.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:08 PM
>Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv forbid..
>
>
>> On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:13:21 -0300, Diego B. Contezini <diego at redesul.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > TomHow the suspend, forbid should have too a reason.. its simple to
>> > implement, and helps a lot...
>> > someone have some idea about to do it?
>> >
>> >
>> > Diego Bitencourt Contezini aka destruct_
>> >
>>
>> it seems to me that nickserv and chanserv FORBID are designed for
>> nicks and channels in which something is wrong with the nick
>> or channel *name*, and not the person or group of people involved.
>>
>> Therefore, when using forbid, the reason for forbidding that
>> nickname/channel name should be obvious.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
>> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
>>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices