[IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R

[Medice]

hm - I guess I should have understand that thing the other way round 
just at the first turn...
I think your right, I got that idea wrong...
In this case it's totally different story and worth a close 
consideration in my opinion.
Sorry for any bad mood, in fact I was surprised first, since Dionisios 
usually writes perfectly reasonable stuff to the maillist and now i got 
him wrong - sorry

greets Medice


Bergee wrote:
>     Either I've misunderstood you and Dionisios K. or I think he meant 
> something different from what you're talking about.  I think he is 
> suggesting that IRCServices should treat +R like it treats +A or +O. 
> That is to say, right now, if a channel is +O then IRCServices will kick 
> anyone that joins the channel that is not a global IRCop.  So what I 
> took his suggestion to mean is that he wants IRCServices to kick the 
> user out of the channel if they don't have a registered nickname and +R 
> is set on the channel.
>     If this is indeed what he is suggesting, then I would say that it 
> might be worth considering.  I guess that's useful really in two 
> situations. First if a user is the first one to join a channel and +R is 
> mode locked on, because the IRCd would then not enforce +R because of 
> course the channel did not exist at the time.  Secondly I suppose would 
> be on syncs from netsplits where one side did not have +R and say some 
> spam bots managed to get in on on a split server.  I guess in general I 
> think it is worth enforcing the mode simply for consistency in 
> IRCServices since +A, +O and +z on Unreal are already enforced.
>     And if this isn't what you meant Dionisios, then I suggest what I 
> thought you meant.  What does everyone else on the list think of that? :)
> 
> Bergee
>