[IRCServices Coding] Services 5.0pre9 released

[Andrew Church]

     One of the main problems with allowing both is what you do when e.g.
AUTODEOP is set positive and SECUREOPS is set, when NOJOIN is set higher
than AUTODEOP, etc.  Yes, I could write logic to handle all this, but that
gets complex, and complexity leads to bugs.  Negative access levels aren't
used for anything else at the moment anyway, so I'd personally prefer that
you got used to SECUREOPS and RESTRICTED instead.

  --Andrew Church
    achurch at achurch.org
    http://achurch.org/

>now a few people have appeared saying they use RESTRICTED and SECUREOPS.. 
>chances are these may cause arguments.. granted, SECUREOPS and RESTICTED are 
>just mass NOJOIN and NOOP some users would rather have them.. than having to 
>set every nickname on the network to -1 and -100 on the access list :p
>
>i have a feeling there is gonna be a dispute over this.. possibly have the 
>option to switch NOJOIN and NOOP as well as RESTRICTED and SECUREOPS off and 
>on in the config file? means everyone who wants them.. can have them, and 
>also saves arguments :)