[IRCServices Coding] Services 5.0pre9 released

[Finny Merrill]

On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Andrew Church wrote:

>      One of the main problems with allowing both is what you do when e.g.
> AUTODEOP is set positive and SECUREOPS is set, when NOJOIN is set higher
> than AUTODEOP, etc.  Yes, I could write logic to handle all this, but that
> gets complex, and complexity leads to bugs.  Negative access levels aren't
> used for anything else at the moment anyway, so I'd personally prefer that
> you got used to SECUREOPS and RESTRICTED instead.
> 

Well there are things with AUTODEOP and NOJOIN that you simply can't do 
with SECUREOPS and RESTRICTED. For instance, if I add someone as 
auto-voice or auto-halfop and turn secureops on, I can't op the 
auto-voiced/halfopped people. Before, I could set AUTODEOP to 0.