[IRCServices] ChanServ does not add NickServ noop to ChanServ NeverOp

[Casey]

When someone adds a person to the NeverOp list to not be given ops at 
all when someone does +o / +h them.

someone who is on NickServ noop cannot be added to the NeverOp list.



Kieron Thwaites wrote:
> I don't think it really matters. Whether the user has NickServ NOOP or
> is on the ChanServ NOP list, the effect is the same - the nick will
> not receive channel operator status.
>
> On the other hand, it could be useful to add NOOP users to the
> ChanServ NOP list, in the event of a user removing his NOOP status at
> a later stage.
>
> (Interesting thought - I wonder if the ACCESS command has the same
> restrictions? I'll play around with it this evening.)
>
> --K
>
> On 14/09/2007, Casey <caseyclaydon at fastmail.com.au> wrote:
>   
>> With NickServ noop on - ChanServ does not add NickServ noop to ChanServ
>> NeverOp
>>
>>
>> -ChanServ- Maintains the NeverOp (NOP) list for a channel.  Users with
>> -ChanServ- NOP status are not permitted to be given channel operator
>> -ChanServ- (mode +o) status, and ChanServ will remove mode +o from such
>> -ChanServ- users whenever it is given to them.
>>
>>
>> NickServ noop should be allowed to be added to ChanServ NeverOp
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
>> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
>>
>>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
>