[IRCServices] ChanServ does not add NickServ noop to ChanServ NeverOp

[Kieron Thwaites]

I don't think it really matters. Whether the user has NickServ NOOP or
is on the ChanServ NOP list, the effect is the same - the nick will
not receive channel operator status.

On the other hand, it could be useful to add NOOP users to the
ChanServ NOP list, in the event of a user removing his NOOP status at
a later stage.

(Interesting thought - I wonder if the ACCESS command has the same
restrictions? I'll play around with it this evening.)

--K

On 14/09/2007, Casey <caseyclaydon at fastmail.com.au> wrote:
> With NickServ noop on - ChanServ does not add NickServ noop to ChanServ
> NeverOp
>
>
> -ChanServ- Maintains the NeverOp (NOP) list for a channel.  Users with
> -ChanServ- NOP status are not permitted to be given channel operator
> -ChanServ- (mode +o) status, and ChanServ will remove mode +o from such
> -ChanServ- users whenever it is given to them.
>
>
> NickServ noop should be allowed to be added to ChanServ NeverOp
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
>